Tara Bobgreg Unairbrushed!
THE DIRTY ARMY: I’ve been seeing a sh*t load of comments wishing they could see Tara Babcock with no airbrush to see if she ACTUALLY looked like she did in her pics…a friend of mine actually found the site with unedited proofs from a shoot she did. We both think she’s nasty…here’s the unedited next to the edited…gross either way….
Weird, I really don’t see that much airbrushing?- nik
thats MINIMAL airbrushing. weird!
the first image is already photoshopped thats why its a proof, the second image is fully photoshopped. I model I know how its done. It says proof which is still a photoshopped image. nice try kiddo
A proof is a completely unedited image with only one alteration: the batch processed watermark. It would take far too long to airbrush every single proof as REAL models get 1000 or more proofs a shoot. They are used just as a reference when choosing which to edit later. That’s what it is…I’m not saying this girl didn’t airbrush it later, but if it is a real proof, it is UNTOUCHED….what kind of “modeling” do you do? lol
Both pictures are the same and are airbrushed. How could you even think for a second they aren’t? Wow.
Completely irrelevent.
irrelevant* spelling everything wrong today zzzz
agree
Need to see her face without photoshop! Her face is too far away in this picture.
there is always something going on in the nose area in her pics…like it’s kinda fuzzy and blurry.
from a girl’s point of view, her body is gorgeous… she is tan without looking orange, her boobs don’t sag (i’m sure they are fake though), she has tiny, toned legs, & is perfectly skinny… no back fat. butttttt what does her face look like close up??
Watch her video… you can actually see how beat she truely is without make up
I mean how ugly she is without airbrush
Nope, she still has make up caked on 10 layers thick in that video.
yeah these pics are deceiving. this chick is busted and her nose is huge.
Bobgreg sent this in herself.
Both pictures are airbrushed/photoshopped.
Don’t get fooled people.
Something funny about her lips here: looks like she’s been sucking d*ck for an extended period of time. Kinda like what happens to chicks who are giving me head when I pass out
Her face isn’t airbrushed in that first pic?
Yeah, and I’m built like Shaq downstairs……..
I would hit that no problem. She has some DSL’s but looks good overall with a great body.
Body good. Head no. Get a close up of her face with no make up and no airbrush..JACKED
She has no DSL’s, she puts her lipstick on like an old woman (way outside of her natural lip line), because she has no lips. There is definitely airbrushing on both pics. I’m sure she sent this in.
It’s sad, she’s not even legal and she already looks like a washed up 32 year old.
I think you got duped on this one little buddy. this is a tricky way to make herself look good to you, cuz there is no difference. My take is they are both airbrushed, but I would hit it sideways for at least 15 minutes.
knock it off scott
does it really matter?
It’s good lighting…I am a photographer and I think the lighting, whether in a shoot or in person, can make or break beauty. For instance, at most convention type events like HIN, most of the models look pretty bad under the flourescent light because it brings out flaws…maybe some that aren’t even there. People can look totally different with different lighting…isn’t necessarily photoshopped…I’ve seen some of this photographer’s work and it looks pretty amazing straight out of camera…again…educated opinion…
she looks like a blow-up doll.
Thi sis airbrushed anyone that has seen this chick in person knows how big that nose really is and her face is sunken in like an alien not nicely filled out and smooth. Stamp proof on what you like but these are still photo shopped
you can tell they’re the same air brushed picture from her warped bicep
SC shot these. They’re photoshopped believe me.
The watermark was put on AFTER they were ran through DGem and pshopped.
Photogs do this so the model cant rip all the pics and post/sell them when she’s choosing the one’s she wants.
Girls like this pay for shoots and are allowed a certain amount. Once they pick out a few shots they like, they’re sent the one’s without the watermark.
That is a proof, illegally obtained from my website and posted on this site. I will be filing a DMCA notice to your web hosting company if you do not remove this immediately. I will also advise Tara to pursue a defamation of character case.
Those of you who make derogatory comments about Tara have not seen her in person. My proofs do not look drastically different from my final edits. The poster who made the educated comment about the lighting is correct.
Take it down or hear from my attorney. NOW.
lol
haha… You’re funny.
Who cares, it’s a no-name model and photographer doing some crappy myspace photoshoot
I’d pound it a new hole!