This who ordeal with her is soo ridiculous… I may not stand with her on her views against gay marriage, but she shares the same opinion as the majority of americans… and these photos..seriously?? yah they are “semi-nude” but what the hell is wrong with them?? their not sexual in nature, sure shes in her undies but shes a freaking model!
If she loses her crown over these photos that is so stupid, we keep a ms usa who was caught doing blow and making out with chicks, but we would get rid of this girl because really some people out there just want to ruin the poor thing.
hypocrit maybe.. we all are.
she doesnt agree with gay marriage, who cares? we all know that this is what it really is all about… why the hell are we backing of all people perez hilton and letting that idiot get his way.
If that’s it then the media needs a new hobby. It’s a big deal when she does a money shot spread with a guy exploding all over her back. As far as being a good christian girl, who cares? Let God deal with her if it’s really a sin. I would date her in a second and so would most of the tards on TV.
A hypocrite because no Christian wuold be a lingerie model? So, any woman who wouldn’t be a lingerie model is a Christian? Does that mean the women in Iraq and Iran are really Christians? [If a non-Christian can do it, it isn't proof of Christianity.]
A hypocrite because no Christian wuold be a lingerie model? So, any woman who wouldn’t be a lingerie model is a Christian? Does that mean the women in Iraq and Iran are really Christians? [If a non-Christian can do it, it isn't proof of Christianity.]
Its not a nude photo since no naught bits are showing. Its not like it makes any difference if the naughty bits are covered by clothes, props, or just going the other way, we don’t see them. The only purpose of clothes is to hide the good stuff, so if that stuff is hidden it is, for all practical purposes, just the same as if there were clothes there.
As far as a semi-nude photo, well, any photo that shows ANY SKIN AT ALL is semi-nude. To be non-nude would require covering ALL skin. I’m pretty sure all these girls were semi nude for the competition. About the only competition I’d expect the models to really be fully non-nude is Miss Islam.
Get the f*ck over it!!! So, she hurt some little fa&&ot$ feelings??!!! So what?? Its not like its his first time getting his ass hurt if you know what I mean. Everyone who is against her is just another hater with a pathetic little life.
Creepy, creepy, creepy. All of you big, brawny guys beating up on this girl because she answered a question honestly. What a bunch of puckered, sore assholes.
why should she loose her crown because of a bunch of f*gs? i see nothing wrong with the photos? too bad they are not as good as Casie’s or Rhina’s
Are all the voters for her to loose her crown haters or homos or both?
if this chick looses her crown I think Barney Frank should lose his seat in the government, if you truly want to be EQUAL. I’d have a lot harder time explaining Barney Frank’s claim to fame to my kids than this model…
Really having a hard time understanding way you call her a hypocrite. She was asked her OPINION about same sex marrage and she gave it. Where is the hypocricy? These pics? I’ve seen worse in the sunday supliments. Also, one is very oviously a photoshopped fake. Not looking to ruffle feathers, but I think you should check your photo sources a little better before displaying them to the world. By the way, thats just MY opinion…….
If this is all you got, then her problem is not the photos, its that she lied about how many (if any) there are. I wouldn’t even call these “semi-nude”. Not that I don’t think you’ve done a public service by displaying them. That’s good, its just that they are not very sexual and therefore nothing for her to worry about -so far.
does anyone find it funny that nick is SO offended by this girl not being for the gays? maybe thats why on every single “would you” post he says NO to every girl lol so lets post a man on the would you and see how he responds lol also a hypocrite would be someone who posts drunk people who have embarrassing pics and he has a dui and a beautiful mug shot lol seriously?
SHES A LIAR .. I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT!!! I BOUGHT THAT SAME PAIR OF UNDERWEAR AROUND APRIL of 07 FOR A LINGERE PARTY! THAT WAS WHEN THEY CAME OUT FROM VICTORIAS SECRET! THAT WAS A VS SPECIAL THAT WAS THE FIRST TIME THEY EVER CAME OUT. ASK ANYONE AT VS …
Nik is a 1st Amendment Bully and coward at the same time. He is quick to throw barbs at anyone and everyone under the guise of the protection of the 1st Amendment but can’t take the heat when the fire is returned back on him.
No different than the bikini portion of the Miss USA pageant! Get a life. Don’t hate because she is hot AND has an opinion that may not agree with yours.
The only reason people are going after her is because she spoke out against the Homosexuals & Lesbians period. And her being topless has nothing to do with being against homosexual & lesbian marriage. A lot of people who not even christian or religious don’t believe in it either. Look at what happens when they vote on it. Face it freedom of speech only applies to the ones who agree with homosexuals, lesbians, etc…
If those pics are nude, then every chic at the mall is walking around nude! In this day and time if a Christian stands-up for their faith the liberal press bashs them, this country with its gay marrige garbage is on the brink of Hell. Wake-up America, this nation was formed as Christian Nation, I don’t care what the President says! And, yes she has every right to speak her opinion.
I really don’t see what the fuss is about. She has a cute butt. Hell, I’d lick it and stick it. And her outfit here is just as skimpy as the bikini that she wore during the pagent.
Doesn’t she have the right to believe what she wants. Just because she doesn’t believe in Gay Marriage doesn’t make her homophobic. I guess if she wasn’t from Calif. it wouldnn’t matter. So she did some photos for a modeling career that isn’t porn….we believe in Gay sex but can’t have porn….how hypocritical. Leave the girl alone, quit your bashing of anyone who doesn’t believe in all of your liberal agendas, everyone has the right to speak their mind. Everyone doesn’t agree with all of you California libs. Thank god Nancy Pelosi didn’t pose in those photos. Why don’t you bash Nancy Pelosi, did you all know she is married to a man, she must be homphobic
Just a bunch of 3rd class lawyers jumping up trying to make a name for themselves and making a buck. Gotta give em cradit! This is easier than chasing ambulances! What a bunch of loosers!
What’s with the image quality between the 2 pics? Did the photographer switch out his digital for his antique kodak halfway through the shoot? Also, it seems like in pic 2 that there is a substantially bigger distance between armpits and ass, i.e. much longer torso. Lastly, in pic 1, the panties are skin tight, but in pic 2, they are loose at the bottom edge. It seems to me like this is 1 legit pic of a really fine ass and 1 photoshopped pic of someone elses ass. Anyone agree? Either way, she’s got a nice ass.
photo 2 is obviously photoshopped. They didn’t even use the same background. She’s standing in front of a totally different doorway. Also the body is different and the panties don’t fit the same. Then there’s the most glaring issue of the image quality. Photo 2 is an obvious fake. If she weren’t famous, Nik would be looking at a serious libel suit.
I KNOW that those pics weren’t taken when she was 17 cause those underwear are Victoria Secret, I have a pair. And they just came out in stores about 6 months ago! So unless she is “SO SPECIAL” that she is able to get hers before anyone else, she was being a bad bad girl by being dishonest.
this argument has been used before. You say 6 months, someone else says 2007. Someone else claims to have owned them in 05. Seriously, I didn’t know that people kept track of model years on underwear.
ranger20 says:
she is a bad girl , not worth to be a miss of CA
to ranger20Anonymous says:
This who ordeal with her is soo ridiculous… I may not stand with her on her views against gay marriage, but she shares the same opinion as the majority of americans… and these photos..seriously?? yah they are “semi-nude” but what the hell is wrong with them?? their not sexual in nature, sure shes in her undies but shes a freaking model!
to AnonymousIf she loses her crown over these photos that is so stupid, we keep a ms usa who was caught doing blow and making out with chicks, but we would get rid of this girl because really some people out there just want to ruin the poor thing.
hypocrit maybe.. we all are.
she doesnt agree with gay marriage, who cares? we all know that this is what it really is all about… why the hell are we backing of all people perez hilton and letting that idiot get his way.
Dustin says:
If that’s it then the media needs a new hobby. It’s a big deal when she does a money shot spread with a guy exploding all over her back. As far as being a good christian girl, who cares? Let God deal with her if it’s really a sin. I would date her in a second and so would most of the tards on TV.
to DustinNat says:
Needs some english school. Just because of her sentence structure of the question she answered, no way Jose. Hell no.
to Natbooring says:
who cares
to booringocd says:
where’s the option for “who gives a fu*k”?
to ocdd dog says:
post the other pics
to d dogThe Ambassador says:
Good God, this chic is going to be in the news longer than 9-11… She’s beat down on all fronts, move on…
to The AmbassadorAnonymous says:
Corbin the douche
to AnonymousAnonymous says:
A hypocrite because no Christian wuold be a lingerie model? So, any woman who wouldn’t be a lingerie model is a Christian? Does that mean the women in Iraq and Iran are really Christians? [If a non-Christian can do it, it isn't proof of Christianity.]
to AnonymousAnonymous says:
the real question is why was perez hilton a judge?
to AnonymousRhisiart says:
A hypocrite because no Christian wuold be a lingerie model? So, any woman who wouldn’t be a lingerie model is a Christian? Does that mean the women in Iraq and Iran are really Christians? [If a non-Christian can do it, it isn't proof of Christianity.]
to Rhisiartwinokurtdog says:
your question should be yes or no. the real question is why was perez hilton a judge?
to winokurtdogClueful says:
Its not a nude photo since no naught bits are showing. Its not like it makes any difference if the naughty bits are covered by clothes, props, or just going the other way, we don’t see them. The only purpose of clothes is to hide the good stuff, so if that stuff is hidden it is, for all practical purposes, just the same as if there were clothes there.
As far as a semi-nude photo, well, any photo that shows ANY SKIN AT ALL is semi-nude. To be non-nude would require covering ALL skin. I’m pretty sure all these girls were semi nude for the competition. About the only competition I’d expect the models to really be fully non-nude is Miss Islam.
to CluefulTho says:
It’s her goddamn opinion, she shouldn’t lose her crown just for making that comment on gays or showing a little breast.
to ThoXuxa says:
Get the f*ck over it!!! So, she hurt some little fa&&ot$ feelings??!!! So what?? Its not like its his first time getting his ass hurt if you know what I mean. Everyone who is against her is just another hater with a pathetic little life.
to XuxaDiana says:
The 1st photo is real the 2nd one is fake
to DianaN-Pazi says:
I would smack it up, flip it AND rub it down
to N-PaziSeth says:
Creepy, creepy, creepy. All of you big, brawny guys beating up on this girl because she answered a question honestly. What a bunch of puckered, sore assholes.
to SethAnonymous says:
i see nothing wrong with this at all.. shes not nude and its pretty much as much as you see at the beach…
to AnonymousGet something else.... says:
who cares Nik…this is old just like The Dirty.
to Get something else....real story says:
stupid controversy. A swimsuit shows more.
to real storyReggie says:
Isn’t her lat name Prejan? Good god, get it right you douche.
to ReggieDude says:
Monday eh? I think the entire world has pretty much lost interest by now.
to DudeAnonymous says:
why should she loose her crown because of a bunch of f*gs? i see nothing wrong with the photos? too bad they are not as good as Casie’s or Rhina’s
to AnonymousAre all the voters for her to loose her crown haters or homos or both?
VENOM™ says:
This is just becoming sad and desperate now.
to VENOM™Never seen a “straight” man fight so hard for gays right to marriage.
geez says:
if this chick looses her crown I think Barney Frank should lose his seat in the government, if you truly want to be EQUAL. I’d have a lot harder time explaining Barney Frank’s claim to fame to my kids than this model…
to geezRick says:
Really having a hard time understanding way you call her a hypocrite. She was asked her OPINION about same sex marrage and she gave it. Where is the hypocricy? These pics? I’ve seen worse in the sunday supliments. Also, one is very oviously a photoshopped fake. Not looking to ruffle feathers, but I think you should check your photo sources a little better before displaying them to the world. By the way, thats just MY opinion…….
to RickNothing here to Lie For says:
If this is all you got, then her problem is not the photos, its that she lied about how many (if any) there are. I wouldn’t even call these “semi-nude”. Not that I don’t think you’ve done a public service by displaying them. That’s good, its just that they are not very sexual and therefore nothing for her to worry about -so far.
to Nothing here to Lie ForPygmy's Love Child says:
I smell a new “Vivid Girl”
to Pygmy's Love Childtom says:
I didn’t get to see her tits! What was the big deal? I see more than that at the mall. Somebody needs to get a life!
to tomNew Dirty Celeb Name says:
Nik Snitchie
to New Dirty Celeb NameLEROYJENKINS says:
A fresh DUI and now posting kidding porn, Impressive
to LEROYJENKINSwtf says:
does anyone find it funny that nick is SO offended by this girl not being for the gays? maybe thats why on every single “would you” post he says NO to every girl lol so lets post a man on the would you and see how he responds lol also a hypocrite would be someone who posts drunk people who have embarrassing pics and he has a dui and a beautiful mug shot lol seriously?
to wtfBigD says:
Let us know when she does a real nude photo. Until then, this entire smear campaign is an EPIC FAIL!!!
to BigDSheila* says:
SHES A LIAR .. I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT!!! I BOUGHT THAT SAME PAIR OF UNDERWEAR AROUND APRIL of 07 FOR A LINGERE PARTY! THAT WAS WHEN THEY CAME OUT FROM VICTORIAS SECRET! THAT WAS A VS SPECIAL THAT WAS THE FIRST TIME THEY EVER CAME OUT. ASK ANYONE AT VS …
to Sheila*anonymous says:
Post pics of yourself to prove it
to anonymousLEROYJENKINS says:
Nik is a 1st Amendment Bully and coward at the same time. He is quick to throw barbs at anyone and everyone under the guise of the protection of the 1st Amendment but can’t take the heat when the fire is returned back on him.
to LEROYJENKINSGhosts of 'gina's past... says:
I hate to agree with Dan but he has a point. That’s the finest posterior I’ve ever seen. I’m proud to have that a$$ represent our state…and nation !!!
to Ghosts of 'gina's past...Denogginizer says:
No different than the bikini portion of the Miss USA pageant! Get a life. Don’t hate because she is hot AND has an opinion that may not agree with yours.
to DenogginizerJoJo says:
She should be publicly spanked, then all will be forgiven.
to JoJoSP says:
The only reason people are going after her is because she spoke out against the Homosexuals & Lesbians period. And her being topless has nothing to do with being against homosexual & lesbian marriage. A lot of people who not even christian or religious don’t believe in it either. Look at what happens when they vote on it. Face it freedom of speech only applies to the ones who agree with homosexuals, lesbians, etc…
to SP343w says:
If those pics are nude, then every chic at the mall is walking around nude! In this day and time if a Christian stands-up for their faith the liberal press bashs them, this country with its gay marrige garbage is on the brink of Hell. Wake-up America, this nation was formed as Christian Nation, I don’t care what the President says! And, yes she has every right to speak her opinion.
to 343wHit It From The Back says:
I really don’t see what the fuss is about. She has a cute butt. Hell, I’d lick it and stick it. And her outfit here is just as skimpy as the bikini that she wore during the pagent.
to Hit It From The BackGeneb says:
Doesn’t she have the right to believe what she wants. Just because she doesn’t believe in Gay Marriage doesn’t make her homophobic. I guess if she wasn’t from Calif. it wouldnn’t matter. So she did some photos for a modeling career that isn’t porn….we believe in Gay sex but can’t have porn….how hypocritical. Leave the girl alone, quit your bashing of anyone who doesn’t believe in all of your liberal agendas, everyone has the right to speak their mind. Everyone doesn’t agree with all of you California libs. Thank god Nancy Pelosi didn’t pose in those photos. Why don’t you bash Nancy Pelosi, did you all know she is married to a man, she must be homphobic
to GenebIwashere says:
Just a bunch of 3rd class lawyers jumping up trying to make a name for themselves and making a buck. Gotta give em cradit! This is easier than chasing ambulances! What a bunch of loosers!
to Iwasherej.b. says:
Miss America is differnt than Miss USA
to j.b.dave says:
What’s with the image quality between the 2 pics? Did the photographer switch out his digital for his antique kodak halfway through the shoot? Also, it seems like in pic 2 that there is a substantially bigger distance between armpits and ass, i.e. much longer torso. Lastly, in pic 1, the panties are skin tight, but in pic 2, they are loose at the bottom edge. It seems to me like this is 1 legit pic of a really fine ass and 1 photoshopped pic of someone elses ass. Anyone agree? Either way, she’s got a nice ass.
to daveanonymous says:
photo 2 is obviously photoshopped. They didn’t even use the same background. She’s standing in front of a totally different doorway. Also the body is different and the panties don’t fit the same. Then there’s the most glaring issue of the image quality. Photo 2 is an obvious fake. If she weren’t famous, Nik would be looking at a serious libel suit.
to anonymousanonymous says:
I agree. I posted the same thing about 5 minutes ago and it got deleted….hmmmm, what’s up with the censorship?
to anonymouspoop says:
I would lick that ass – what a great looking girl
to pooplil miss fibber says:
I KNOW that those pics weren’t taken when she was 17 cause those underwear are Victoria Secret, I have a pair. And they just came out in stores about 6 months ago! So unless she is “SO SPECIAL” that she is able to get hers before anyone else, she was being a bad bad girl by being dishonest.
to lil miss fibberanonymous says:
this argument has been used before. You say 6 months, someone else says 2007. Someone else claims to have owned them in 05. Seriously, I didn’t know that people kept track of model years on underwear.
to anonymous