Wannabe Slim Shady


THE DIRTY ARMY: Nik, here we have Brandon Perry. If you wanna hear from this ‘flyy *ss gangsta’ you better be under the age of 14. This little boy thinks he is a ‘G’ or a ‘crip’. But in reality he is just a child. He definitely wishes he was the new slim shady. From the style right to the bleached hair. This one just leads little girls on, but never ever sees them in person. Its all a bunch of computer talk. I consider him a f*g, but he just wont admit it. He needs a serious reality check, and needs to be told he ain’t TOP SH*T. Hes a little boy with no real friends because he is bipolar and decides he doesn’t need friends one day until he is bored and lonely. You are not a thug or a gangsta, you are a child. GROW UP NOW LIL BOY, YOU’RE NOT 13 ANYMORE!!!
Nice shorts, do you starch em every night?- nik









Is this Little punk for real?? Seriously??
You fucking losers don’t have any dirt on this dude !!!! The only thing u say is that he is bi polar , lol ya cause he can help that . Who ever put this guy on here deserves to have there old retarded parents put on this fucking web site !!!
k SIMON, your stupid.. like why the fuck do you care? this is on here as a fucking joke you idiot. so why dont you fuck off and complain somewhere else? shiiiit. and ya you can help being bi polar, its called taking your fukin MEDS. if you dont know the kid then who the fuck cares. and im pretty sure there was more then being bi polar that was mentioned, like read man
No offence, but if he has a mental illness like bi-polar disorder, is it fair to put him on here?
Hahahha fa**$t !!!
Lol to fck you . You are so stupid . He’s up there for a joke !?! Lol why don’t u put a pic of your nasty fat slut drunk mother up there as a joke !! Haha I can read , and there is nothing up there that is bad about him , so he’s bipolar ?!? Who gives a shit . U probably have AHD cause your so fuckibg stupid . Stupid people like u should be brought to a fuckibg pit and BANG . U fucking retard Mother fucker . Your just jealous of this guy !!
Section 15 – Equality Rights Of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms of every citizen of Canada.
Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
This section of the Charter makes it clear that every individual in Canada – regardless of race, religion, national or ethnic origin, colour, sex, age or physical or mental disability – is to be considered equal. This means that governments must not discriminate on any of these grounds in its laws or programs.
The courts have held that section 15 also protects equality on the basis of other characteristics that are not specifically set out in it. For example, this section has been held to prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.
The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that the purpose of section 15 is to protect those groups who suffer social, political and legal disadvantage in society. Discrimination occurs where, for example, a person, because of a personal characteristic, suffers disadvantages or is denied opportunities available to other members of society.
At the same time as it protects equality, the Charter also allows for certain laws or programs that favour disadvantaged individuals or groups. For example, programs aimed at improving employment opportunities for women, Aboriginal peoples, visible minorities, or those with mental or physical disabilities are allowed under section 15(2).
The following definitions may be helpful in determining whether you or someone you know is experiencing discrimination or harassment:
Discrimination
The Ontario Human Rights Code (OHRC) does not provide a definition for the term discrimination. However, the intent and meaning of the Code along with interpretations of the term contained in judicial decisions suggest that, discrimination is differential treatment based on a personal characteristic which has an adverse impact on an individual or group. Examples of personal characteristics include race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, family status or disability.
Discrimination robs people of their dignity and their ability to fulfill their capabilities. It is important to note that any person or group can discriminate and any person or group can be the target of discrimination. Discrimination can take on several forms:
Sexual Discrimination – includes discrimination on the basis of gender, sex, sexual orientation, etc.
Racial Discrimination – includes discrimination on the basis of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, etc.
Discrimination on the basis of Disability – involves discrimination against a person on the basis of their physical, psychological or mental ability or impairment.
Harassment
The Ontario Human Rights Code defines harassment as “engaging in a course of vexatious comment or conduct that is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome”. This definition has been adopted by The University of Western Ontario in its human rights and equity policies.
The following definitions may further assist with understanding the term harassment and what it entails:
“a course” – in most cases, there must be more than one incident for behaviour to be defined as harassment. However, courts in Canada have found that a single unwelcome incident, if serious enough, can be sufficient to support a harassment complaint.
“vexatious”- unwelcome and has little or no useful, legitimate purpose in the context in which it takes place.
“comment or conduct” – the use of the two terms – comment or conduct – includes actions and words. The actions or words may or may not be aimed at the person complaining of harassment; they may not be aimed at anyone at all. If they are unwelcome and create a poisoned environment, they could be considered harassment.
“known or ought reasonably to be known” – this phrase encompasses both a subjective and objective element. Even if a person is not aware that her behaviour is unwelcome (subjective), if a reasonable person in the same situation would have known that the behaviour was unwelcome, then that person “ought reasonably to have known” that her behaviour was unwelcome.
“unwelcome” – this simply means that the person who has brought the complaint does not wish to be exposed to the behaviour. Unwelcome is in the eye of the beholder.
Harassment is often an abuse of social power, but it is important to remember that any person can harass any other person. Harassment is often defined to include any behavior that creates an intimidating, demeaning or hostile environment. Harassment can take on different forms:
Sexual Harassment – includes harassment on the basis of sex, gender or sexual orientation.
Racial Harassment – includes harassment on the basis of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, etc.
General Harassment – includes harassing behavior not on any of the grounds discussed above (i.e. bullying or personal harassment).
Based on the comments of being Bi-Polar and general discrimination and bullying (PUT YOUR REAL NAMES IN YOUR COMMENTS)