Jade Naraine the cyberstalking psycho and cheap floozy

Jade Naraine the cyberstalking psycho and cheap floozy

THE DIRTY ARMY: I met up Jade Naraine aka Jade Thelwell so called “singer” more than 3 years ago on a dating app. We only been on 2-3 dates and up to these days Jade Naraine is still pestering, stalking and harassing me. She wrote countless of lies on all sorts of website just because I was not interested in her and turned her down. She claims that she was my girlfriend. Like WTF, we only met 2-3 times !! This girl is a delusional liar! Later, I found out that Jade Naraine did the same to many other men that she met online. She just can’t handle rejection. The problem with Jade is that she is extremly dull, boring, superficial and narcissist. She thinks that she is a God’s gift to mens but she is a complete nightmare ! She is also nothing to look at, and to be honest, even with tons of makeup, Jade Naraine has hideous acne. Jade Naraine also admits that she is an floozy that sleep with men in exchange of money. She must be riddled with DRDs ! Beware!


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

  1. peteFebruary 11, 2019 at 7:09 PM

    Jade Naraine is still ugly even with tons of makeup

  2. Anonymous helperFebruary 10, 2019 at 8:16 AM

    We are tired of hearing about how Luke Halstead got that poor girl charged so much for ridiculous stuff like sending legal letters out according to her website. He didn’t just almost kill a man, or commit fire arms charges but the conduct has continued with exposing his son to bombs, and abusing various women behind closed doors. Michelle Roth testifies to having been thrown down the stairs and Jade Naraine testifies to sexual assault. We are coming forward because we want the women to start getting justice and make sure Luke can’t fool police or judges any longer.

    It’s time that anyone who has information about this man comes out and forward to strengthen the cases for the women who have matters before the court.

    Luke Halstead raped a girl Jade Naraine and has tried to have her falsely charged on an ongoing basis for sending legal letters and just a few text messages asking him and some men to leave her alone. Luke sexually assaulted Jade and had a violent past as a criminal where he did 15 months imprisonment for aggravated assault.

    From an anonymous source. We are pointing you here to publicly available information, with references on CanLii. We want to be of assistance but will remain anonymous. We are tired of hearing about how Luke Halstead got that poor girl charged so much for ridiculous stuff like sending legal letters out according to her website. He didn’t just almost kill a man, or commit fire arms charges but the conduct has continued with exposing his son to bombs, and abusing various women behind closed doors. Michelle Roth testifies to having been thrown down the stairs and Jade Naraine testifies to sexual assault. We are coming forward because we want the women to start getting justice and make sure Luke can’t fool police or judges any longer.

    Citation: Roth v. Halstead, 2017 ONCJ 593 – 2017-07-31
    From the Judgment of Justice O’Connell:

    [24] In July of 2010, the father brought an ex parte motion for custody of Thomas. According to the father, the mother had quit her job without a contingency plan and could no longer afford her rent and was facing homelessness. Mr. Halstead deposed that the mother was behaving in an increasingly erratic manner and that she was financially and emotionally unstable so he offered to take Thomas for a period of time.
    [25] Mr. Halstead obtained a temporary without prejudice custody order of Thomas and brought him to his home in Pembroke. Mr. Halstead then abandoned his application in August of 2010 when Ms Roth agreed to move to his mother’s basement apartment, where she had lived previously and been assisted by the paternal grandmother. Mr. Halstead returned Thomas to Ms Roth’s primary care shortly after that.
    This is also when Luke’s Court Martial took place according to the public records. The actual date when the ‘offense’ for this court martial took place is unknown, but it can be assumed, based on the seriousness of the charge, it was shortly before the trial:
    It’s assumed that Luke failed to inform the judges, that he was scheduled to attend a court martial only 5 days later to face charges “for having in your possession without lawful excuse a number of blank and live ammunition and different grenades, simulators, basically, pyrotechnic devices.” He was found guilty.

    Citation: R. v. Halstead, 2010 CM 3018 – 2010-09-01
    The Judge noted:
    • “But the quantity is a very serious aggravating factor. You kept a lot, which is very unusual; it’s more than keeping a souvenir in your house.”
    • “The other thing is the type of ammunition; hand grenades, simulators, or trip flares contain substances which are very dangerous, especially—and it brings me to the second aggravating factor I consider—is the place for storing all those things.”
    • “You bring this at your home. You know in the Canadian Forces we keep that in a special place in order to avoid—for security reasons and because we don’t want to have all people accessing this and playing with that. You brought this at your house. So I understand that from your perspective you probably had access to this, but it also means that others may have access to this, and other people that may come in your house, not having a clue how to handle this, and expose themselves to any kind of injury or any other thing.”
    • “…but you didn’t have on your mind how dangerous it could have been if somebody, not knowing how to use this, would have played with that.”
    • “It’s difficult to the court to reconcile the fact that you’re wearing this appointment and that you kept all those things at your home. You should have, at some point, decided to bring back all those things knowing how dangerous it could have been for yourself and anybody else.”

    Citation: R. v. Halstead, [1999] O.J. No. 5418 (SCJ) [MISSING!].
    Referenced in: R. v. Pangan, 2014 ONCJ 327 (CanLII) and R. v. Braithwaite, 2010 MBPC 53 (CanLII)

    From R. v. Braithwaite, 2010:

    [17… In R. v. Halstead, [1999] O.J. No. 5418, a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, an offender, with four others, participated in the savage beating of a victim. The victim was chosen at random and attacked for money and to steal his stereo. The group beat him into unconsciousness, broke some of his teeth and permanently mangled one ear. The offender was 19 at the time and lived on the street where he abused alcohol and drugs. He had no prior record and was on bail for nine moths with no problems. He had addressed his substance abuse and was back in school. He was sentenced to 15 months imprisonment and probation. An important factor was that by the time of sentencing, he did not seem to be a continuing risk to the community. …
    Luke was 17 at the time just turning 18; however, sometimes they get the ages wrong. Information is not always accurate. Luke has allegedly had a criminal record that he had expunged. This was from a period when Luke was an adult. We don’t know the exact date of the 1999 incident or when it was expunged. Since it was expunged, the records cannot be searched.
    Everything else lines up, substance abuse, homelessness etc

    Also, from the Court Martial:

    [12] c. The fact that you did not have an entry on your conduct sheet related to similar offences. Despite the fact that you have a conduct sheet, the entry on it has no relation, as mentioned by your counsel, to the facts or to the kind of offence you are facing today. (This would have been his drug charges, which happened before the army.
    This means that Luke had a separate disciplinary action or hearing while employed full-time by the Canadian Army. We don’t know what that is, but we do know that Luke DID have at least one assault charge for sure. This would be in addition (one would assume) from whatever this indecent on his conduct sheet might be.
    Luke probably fails to tell anyone during trials that he had previously been court martialed and charged with munitions charges. This would have likely affect the court’s decisions based on the fact that the activity Luke seems to admit to doing, is a contravention of the Canadian Firearms Act; and would represent a pattern of firearms abuse.

    [76] However, Mr. Halstead admitted that shortly after the recommendations of the
    JFCS child protection worker and the OCL clinical investigator, Mr. Halstead took Thomas
    to a shooting range on Crown land where Mr. Halstead then created an explosive device
    using Tannerite taped to a saline bag on a propane tank, taped to a tree. He and Thomas then
    watched it explode. This occurred during their two week summer holiday together in July of
    [110] Ms Roth believes that despite the OCL recommendations that Thomas not be
    exposed to firearms, the father continues to do so and that the father does not respect Thomas’s wishes in this regard. She cites the Tannerite explosive device incident that occurred during Thomas’s summer holiday with his father in July of 2016 as an example. This incident occurred after the 2016 recommendations of the both the OCL investigator and the children’s aid society that Thomas not be exposed to firearms.
    [267] When told during cross-examination that after the release of the OCL Report and
    recommendations, the father had exposed Thomas to an explosion on a shooting range near
    his property, Ms. Barlas testified that she would be very concerned about this given Thomas’
    clear views and preferences about being exposed to gun activity.
    [313] The father’s decision to arrange for an explosive device to be detonated in a
    shooting range during his summer holidays with Thomas only months after the OCL
    clinician recommended that Thomas not be exposed to guns or gun activity was ill advised to
    say the least and an example of very poor judgment. The father’ evidence that he did not
    recall whether he used a gun to cause the explosion was not credible and simply did not
    accord with common sense.
    As with the pattern of firearms abuse – if Luke was the offender in the earlier assault incident cited in R. v. Braithwaite, 2010; and if the incident on the conduct sheet is at all related to assault, how is it that those records would have been expunged?
    If the facts here are lined up:

    • It seems that Luke maybe have had an assault incident that is sealed due to the fact that he was underaged at the time.

    • He had an assault charge (for which he received probation) expunged as an adult. This was an incident that happened while he was an adult.

    • He has a second (non-munitions) entry on his army conduct sheet that likely the Superior Court did not know about at the time his records were expunged. It seems clear that, as with the munitions charges, he also fails to mention his previous assault-related incidents when he went before the court to request his records be expunged.

    Luke does brag about being able to ‘get out of trouble’ because of his job and uniform as a paramedic. Specifically, multiple traffic violations.

    When an officer stops a person for a traffic violation, is a record kept of the ‘search’ on the license plate, even when no charge or official warning is given to the driver?
    – If so, it’s likely there is a long list of traffic stops associate with Luke, but with no charges or fine levied.

  3. GregJanuary 20, 2019 at 6:06 AM

    And she is back on Seeking Arrangements trying the same thing yet again.

  4. henriSeptember 1, 2018 at 8:19 PM

    Jade has a heart of gold

  5. Jade's daddyJuly 13, 2018 at 7:53 PM

    I met up Jade Naraine online and she is a p4p.
    And she is truly ugly in person, with hideous acne. YUCK !!!

  6. Michelle's friendJuly 13, 2018 at 2:53 PM

    This is most likely written by lawyer Andrei Korottchenko, Jade’s stalker and possibly Luke Halstead, the guy who raped her. Her website says she got involved with some bad men over the past few years because she was vulnerable. One of them was a complete sociopath. Google Luke Halstead… I actually know Luke’s ex-girlfriend Michelle Roth and wrote to Jade to give her some evidence to use in her court cases against him. I’ll write it here too. You can find them in Roth v Halstead in the public court records.

    1. Luke Halstead didn’t just sexually assault Jade. Another woman who doesn’t know him, testified in court records that he is verbally, physically and mentally abusive to women.
    2. He was in contempt of the court twice.
    3. He was stated to not be credible, by a judge!
    4. His son suffers Depression, Anxiety and low self-esteem because of him.
    5. Another woman describes him to have similar traits to a sociopath, just like Jade.
    6. He slandered other girls to have borderline personality disorder, who have no mental illnesses.
    7. He’s being sued by multiple women for over 1.5M for sex assault, child custody with no access, child support, and public mischief for having his girlfriends falsely charged.
    8. He was charged with assault and drugs but got a record destruction so now he’s a part-time paramedic.
    9. He’s verbally abusive and forces his son to do activities he doesn’t want to do.
    10. He made a bomb and was warned by the OPP and chief of firearms with a warning placed on his licence.
    11. He’s a polyamory sex addict
    Note that any comments below, are written by either Andrei Korottchenko or Luke Halstead. Both are obsessed with getting Jade in trouble for her TRUTHFUL postings of these men. Thank God judges in Canada know that a girl posting how a guy treated her is NOT harassment. According to her site, her lawyer Danny Kayfetz says she’s innocent of all of her fake “harassment” charges brought by the stupid men lol and that she will not be accepting any deals. These controlling women user men just can’t stand it when she exposes them for who they are so they ask the police to help them. It appears though, that from her site, judges are more on her side. It says on her site that judges consider her very credible and don’t care about the charges since it’s just an officers opinion until a court finds guilt. The judges have apparently said that her postings of boyfriends are not harassment because she proves that what she says is true so she decided to sue the police for all of the false charges. On bad biz there is also a letter from a lawyer stating that she’s a victim of a bunch of misconduct too. It’s good she’s fighting back. Honestly, most people would just accept it and move on. I mean most girls who don’t get their sex assaults prosecuted or charged just accept misconduct it but I admire her guts and will for fighting back and making change for the better. I think far too many sex assaults go without anything being done. Good for her! Just ignore these guys Jade, you are beautiful inside and out for what you do for girls. Goodluck with all of your cases and your career! :) I hope I helped a bit.

  7. demiJuly 13, 2018 at 2:33 PM

    I am pretty sure this was written by a lawyer named Andrei Korottchenko. All the comments pretending to be other men who dated her are probably also Andrei Korottchenko. According to another site, he’s facing 2 law suits and has been stalking her online. It also says that there’s a group of men who are upset at her cause she revealed a statement of how she was treated by them. They tried to get her in trouble with police but she was innocent of all charges because the judges said her postings were not illegal like police thought, so they decided to start a smear campaign online instead. Andrei needs to be restrained. He’s become obsessed with her life. This girls passport was also illegally seized by police for a minor harassment charge where an investor owed her a payment which she ended up getting when she sued him. Charges were withdrawn but too trusting. She’s a nice girl. Apparently her career was at a standstill for 3 years due to her passport issues but it looks like she’s getting it back in December after two federal court judges ruled that her charter rights were breached, so she should be doing better in her career next year. She might have a lot of money from the Government to launch her career too since she’s launched a multi-million dollar law suit against them, so that’s good for her. Her instagram says she’s planning an American tour next year. Her life is also being made into a true story movie. Bet Andrei and the boys will be jealous of that. My advice to her is to stay away from men and dating and focus on her career and a good man will find her one day.

  8. chuckyJuly 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM

    I also went out with her once, you are correct she is extremely boring and it was the longest couple hours ive ever had…, all about herself and her going nowhere singing career