Attorney “CL Parker” of Georgia aka Cynthia Lynn Parker-Holda
THE DIRTY ARMY: Nik, getting down and dirty, what are the laws or State Bar rules in regards to lawyers who use alias? What if it were reasonable to believe that he or she is doing so to conceal their real identity from the general public because maybe their spouse was a convicted felon that is very well known among the federal courts where said attorney spends most of her days so righteously defending justice? Is it a violation of law for an attorney to use an alias? At minimum, does the State Bar have rules or specifications on such matters? I am not talking about dui’s. I am talking serious repeated patterns of federal offenses.
2 Rules come to mind, but I would like to hear from the dirty experts on this. According to PART III CANONS OF ETHICS CHAPTER 1 CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EC 2-11. The name under which a lawyer conducts his/her practice may be a factor in the selection process. Accordingly a lawyer in private practice should not practice under a firm name that is false, fraudulent, deceptive or that would tend to mislead laypersons as to the identity of the lawyers actually practicing in the firm, the relationship of the lawyers practicing in such firm, or the nature of the firm’s law practice.
This particular case involved the recent indictments of Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Jared Wheat, and his legal counselors Arthur Leach and “CL Parker”. Cynthia Lynn Parker-Holda, (aka CL Parker), is married t Tomasz Holda. A convicted felon,with a series of federal offenses going back nearly 20 years. This is not a guy who got a dui. This is a man with decades of history involving federal drug trafficking offenses, fraud,and money laundering. Her knowledge of his inclination towards such repeated acts of unlawfulness would have to make one call into question her moral character and integrity ? Would it not ? Although no one can prove it (yet), any reasonable person would have to conclude that not only is she aware, but would it be unreasonable to imply she may even be complicit ? And further more if she is complicit, does that make her partnering lawyer Arthur Leach complicit?
Good’ol Artie is another story. He has done some things he probably thinks he got away with,but unlike most old timers, he is oblivious that data is ejaculated all over the dark web. So getting back to this Attorney’s husband, Tomasz Holda, …..he was sent to prison on a previous Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals related case and according to the court docket- “the Government learned that in 2004, Defendant Holda, in the presence of Defendants Wheat, Smith, and other(s), discussed obtaining a firearm silencer for use in attacking a FDA agent conducting a criminal investigation into HiTech’s use of Viagra in its Stamina RX product. While the agent was not harmed it is important to note that in June 2004, Defendant Holda purchased a silencer on the Internet for delivery to his home. This silencer was intercepted by U.S. Customs, and Defendant Holda was prosecuted, and ultimately pleaded guilty, to being a felon in possession of a firearm silencer.” See United States v. Holda, 1:04-CR-368-JEC. T and you can read it right there on page 34 Court dockets show CL Parker or CL Parker, LLC ,represented her husband, and the indicted companies in one capacity or another on a regular basis. I’d go as far as saying that her husband, and his indicted company’s are her only clients. That was not a jab at Attorney Parker, just a general observation. Between lawsuits and their consistent acts of violating federal laws, keeping them out of jail seems to be a full time job for CL Parker and Arthur Leach. Based on the website, Attorney CL Parker is presently partnered,or assists with the Law firm of Arthur Leach. http://www.arthurwleach.com/about-cl/ According to the Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals website,Tom [aka Tomasz] Holda, is the indicted Hi-Tech’s current “Senior Vice President of Manufacturing Operations”. The 2004 criminal cases refer to him as the founder. As of October 2017, “Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals” , has now been indicted yet again. The current charges consist of: Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud,Wire Fraud,Money Laundering Conspiracy,Money Laundering,Conspiracy to Introduce Misbranded Drugs into Interstate Commerce,Introduction into Interstate Commerce of a Misbranded Drug,Conspiracy to Manufacture and Distribute,Manufacturing and Distributing Controlled Substances, and Introducing Misbranded Drugs into Interstate Commerce.
It appears Attorney CL Parker’s husband was able to avoid being criminally charged on that indictment, HOWEVER, not before the Federal Trade Commission went after him and his co-conspirators for a judgment in the amount of $40 million dollars. The government already started taking action with liens and bank garnishments. It looks like the government moved on that as soon as soon as they passed out the indictments. So continuing on with the theme here, the above mentioned case had me considering yet another scenario. According to RULE 1.8 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: (j) A lawyer shall not acquire a proprietary interest in the cause of action or subject matter of litigation the lawyer is conducting for a client. If Attorney CL Parker, and her husband Tomasz Holda own a home together, and some other property, does this rule apply ? Especially considering that the government is seeking to collect on a $40 million dollar judgment from her husband and his co-defendants. Does that rule apply? Or am I misinterpreting it ? What I am left with, is what would be required to prove she is complicit ? Would I be the only guy in the room to believe she knows everything, and that she may even help these illegal entities circumvent the law ? Keep in mind, she represents he husband and the indicted company(s) on a regular basis. Considering the level of corruption of her husband, and his co-defendants, the State Bar of Georgia has no position on that? These co-defendants are apparently life long friends. It’s the same guys getting arrested over and over.
Now this brings me to a far more serious concern I have. And I do state, that this is only an allegation based on gut instinct. It has come to my attention that Attorney CL Parker’s husband [Tomasz Holda] lost a previous wife to “suicide”. Her name was Jessica Holda. Was her “suicide” ever investigated ? Thoroughly ? I understand it was alleged she left a suicide note, but did anyone validate it ? The reason we should be asking this is because if these indicted individuals have the resources to counterfeit documents. That is determined by their most recent indictment. In addition to that, we know CL Parker’s husband [Tomasz Holda] was caught when he purchased a firearm silencer to allegedly kill a federal prosecutor. He was convicted and sent to prison for the firearms charge. All confirmed. Is it unreasonable for anyone to consider that this was NOT a suicide ? Tomasz Holda had been involved with Attorney CL Parker, but they did not get married until 2014. He lost his wife in 2007 What is confirmed , is that we know Jessica Holda was a cooperating witness in the criminal case against her husband and Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals at that time. So we have a cooperating witness that ends up dead, and then they have the gull to go legally go after the prosecutor who is prosecuting them, and blame him ? The Dirty can’t make this up. Tomasz Holda literally tried to sue prosecutor Aaron Danzig, and blamed him for his wife’s suicide ! Aaron Danzig is said by all to be a great man. He is aggressive when fighting corruption, but a good man who plays by the rules, and does the job he is appointed to do. It just seems to me the defendants could have been killing 2 birds with one stone here, and even attempting to profit off the deal. I urge anyone with information on this to speak up.