Did The Shooter Have Fetal Alcohol Syndrome?

Did The Shooter Have Fetal Alcohol Syndrome?

THE DIRTY ARMY: Nik, do you think that the shooter may have had fetal alcohol syndrome and that could’ve contributed to this?

So we are blaming alcohol now and not the assault riffle. Copy.- nik

https://thedirty.com/?p=2240790

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

  1. patriotFebruary 16, 2018 at 5:07 AM

    BTW way Tigre , an AR-15 does not mean Assault Rifle stands for Armalite Rifle. Plus the AR-15 is a .22 caliber rifle It does get used for hunting. Wish all of you would take a gun class!

  2. J.D.February 16, 2018 at 4:33 AM

    That picture is spot on, though. I think it’s important to consider each, and every factor involved in this man’s actions.

  3. BatmanFebruary 16, 2018 at 12:08 AM

    What moron blames the rife?? Did you blame the fertilizer when Tin McVeigh blew up a building?

  4. TheRainMakerFebruary 15, 2018 at 9:18 PM

    I agree with Becka143. It’s almost impossible to ban guns. It’s just lip service for politicians to get votes from dumb people. Crime would actually increase if somehow guns were banned. Criminals will get their guns from the black market and they will take their chances of robbing you knowing you probably don’t have a gun.

  5. RealistoneFebruary 15, 2018 at 7:12 PM

    OP GREAT TO SEE YOU READING THE DRUDGE REPORT!

  6. LotusXTCFebruary 15, 2018 at 3:35 PM

    I like how people keep talking about possible FAS. Possible brain damage.. Possible mental problems.. Possible bullying. This kid killed alot of people.. why are we looking for excuses for justify what he’s done. He’s an asshat pure and simple

  7. Becka143February 15, 2018 at 3:25 PM

    We have large game too. I think the largest problem is everyone already has the guns if it were made illegal it would just aid the the black market and the guns are already everywhere and numero uno written in the constitution is the right to bare arms to change the constitution would b pretty much impossible

  8. Friendly neighbourhood wild-lingFebruary 15, 2018 at 12:33 PM

    FAS may or may not have contributed to this specific tragedy, but considering it was not present in the twenty plus shootings your country has pruduced this year alone I would say asking the question of whether or not fas has anything to do with it deserves a head shake all on its own. The voice of reason should not come from the creator of this web site nor commenters, yet it has come too that. Your gun laws will not change as long as your presidents party accepts donations from any gun manufacturing company. Look for severe changes in people’s baseline behaviour and report if you notice the profile of a shooter. Peace ewwwt

  9. TigreFebruary 15, 2018 at 12:31 PM

    The assault rifle didn’t decide to go into the school and murder people. Having said that, I don’t understand why it is legal for citizens to have access to guns that are designed for the sole purpose of killing lots of people. Assault rifles aren’t suitable for hunting small game.

  10. Georgia97February 15, 2018 at 11:07 AM

    Guns don’t kill people. People do.